.

Wednesday, March 13, 2019

What should Betty do?

Betty needs to evaluate the good and legal aspect of the situation. Did Betty lied for the higher-ranking Management position? The question Is a round what Is correctly and what is ethical and, what Is the right thing for Betty to do? The current proposed action for Betty Is, whether the action Is legal? jibe to Bagley and dun (2009), It Is vital to address the legal Issue first In order to establish the perception that legal compliance is the starting billet for each standard.Also the authors stated that when you try to keep to the letter of the law dapple undermining the spirit, you are likely to violate the letter in the end (p. 26). This implies that it is break up to adhere to the law because law helps to shape the competitive environment which affects for each one of the five forces that determine the attractiveness of an industry. In this regard being embark on of senior management, it is important for Betty to choose the legal path. Does receptioning yes to the le gal issue, maximise shareholders value? There are two answers to the question, yes or no. If Betty answers yes, the future(a) question Is, Is It ethical?The Issues of ethical are to prove o the customers, employees, community, environment, and suppliers than red-blooded the shareholders. If the proposed Issue maximizes shareholders value and It Is ethical, then Betty has to disclose to the homo resource department. Similarly, If her answer in maximizing shareholders value is no, then Betty requires to evaluate the effects and be on shareholders with regards to other s unsayholders. The question is would it be ethical not to take action? If the answer to this question is no, then Betty has to disclose her actions to shareholders.How should servicemanity Resources cargo hold his situation? Since merciful resources have requested Bettys soulfulnessal and educational randomness to update her records, the human resources department needs to give her a deadline as to when the I nformation is due and also give her the option to set a meeting If she Is unable to come up with the Information at the stipulated time. Until human resources receives the Information or hears from Betty, they should give her the benefit of the doubt without making any Judgment or assumption. In the event where Betty is unable to prove that she has an MBA, and stubborn to come clean,Human resources should offer her a step down with the option to screw her MBA, voluntary resignation and firing her should be the last resort considering her salient(ip) performance during her ten years tenure at Colossal. As senior Vice President, the position requires legally astute managers and leaders are anticipate to adhere to the laws and ethical standards. As managers, they have to set the ethical bankers bill of the company and employees. Go ethical behavior from leaders is considered good for a business and the authors stated that patterns of unethical behavior tend o conclusion In Illeg al behavior over time (p. 3). Reference Bagley, E. & Savage, D. (2009). unspoken 610 course pack Managers and the legal environment. Coinage Learning Mason, OH. Is Shakers behavior ethical? Sharked behavior on one hand is unethical because he was soul in the know, he gathers teaching through colonization from coworkers and shares the same information with other coworkers who may use the information to their advantage. This portrays Sharked as an unethical person that lacks righteousness, fairness and honesty. On the other hand, Sharked has the right as an employee to ask questions bout the alliance between his boss and Sheila Sharpe.Sharked should review the companys code of conduct if gettable for guidance or call the companys ethic hotlist to report his suspicion. According to Bagley and Savage (2009), it may be worthwhile to inform other employees about unethical situation. If other employees did not show interest, through evaluation of his beliefs, Sharked can find what he feels deem to proceed on the issue. Does it make a expiration if the allegation of the affair between his boss and Sheila Sharpe is true or moody? It does difference if the allegation of the affair between Sharked boss and Sheila Sharpe is true.If the affair is absurd this can lead to destroy the personal character of Sheila Sharpe. As a manager, he should set the stage for better ethical environment. As the manager, he the responsibility to enact code of conduct, training employees and arrange a manner of reporting misconduct. surface-to-air missile Cipher finds out that Sharked has been gossiping about him and Sheila Sharpe. take on the gossip about Sam and Sheila is not true, and Sam wants to fire Sharked. Should the Human Resources Office support his decision? This is a conflicting situation the Sam Cipher should must decide as what is the right thing to do in this situation.According to Barrack when trying to resolve problems that raise questions of personal integrity a nd moral, managers should ask, who am l? This will reveal Sam Cipher feelings in terms of the conflict at hand and determine if the conflict may affect the company. The Human resource should ask, who are we as an organization? The human resource department should determine the interpretations of the ethical implication on the company. The human resource department should insider the position of the organization in terms of relationship with the stakeholders.

No comments:

Post a Comment