Corporate governance Essay

Introduction somatic governance refers to a system of mostly rules, practices as well as procedures that direct as well as control a company. In most cases it involves the balancing of altogether the s fulfilholders that occupy an interest in the company including the management, shareholders, government, the community to mention but a few depending on the company. Essentially, somatic governance provides a framework that if followed exit help the company attain its objective in an all twist manner.Though a relatively new phenomenon, this concept has been able to take the world by storm with countries that accept embraced it turning in a lot of development that their counterparts. The embracing as well as the internalisation of corporate governance by different countries has been able to foster result and development while creating a business friendly environment in which companies give the gate co-exist with the state as well as the communities in which they cash in ones chips (Fernando, 2009, p.23).Case study the linked StatesAs recent as 2002, the United States enacted the Sarbanes-Oxley bill into law making it an act. This was ushered in to restore the publics confidence in companies and markets. Prior to this act, there had been a string of bankrupted soaring profile companies that had been brought down by internal accounting fraud. This left a twist that imaged that the companies would essentially be governed by state laws and therefore stroke due to breach of such laws would be answerable to the government. This ensures that not only if are the interests of the company shareholders protected but that then community that unremarkably benefits from activities such as employment are also taken attending off. Thus, the country has over years adopted different legislations both at the federal as well as state level that ensure that corporate governance is fully realized in the state.Therefore, from the United States, the UK can learn to enac t strong legislations that would act as a guidelines to both state as well as the companies and any other stakeholders of the wideness of embracing corporate governance. This would also serve the purpose of regulating corporations that give then have to acknowledge the fact that rules have been put in place and therefore have to be followed and that failure of compliance would track to outlined penalties (Chew & Gillan, 2009, p. 3).Case study IndiaIndia, unlike the United States, has created a perpetration that deals with corporate governance know as the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI). The plank that in most cases takes on a trustee role for all the companies in India was created through the adoption of SEBI Act, 1992. The act gives the soundbox statutory powers to be able to carry out its duties and functions. These approach adopted in India is believed to have been adopted from the Ghanaian principle of trusteeship and that it is a directive of the Indian cons titution with a little twist in between. The preamble of the body is to among other functions to protect the interests of investors in securities and to promote the growth (Das, 2008, p. 7).ReferenceChew, D. H., & Gillan, S. L. 2009. U.S. corporate governance. New York, N.Y., Columbia University Press.Das, S. C. 2008. Corporate governance in India an evaluation. New Delhi, Prentice-Hall of India.Fernando, A. C. 2009. Corporate governance principles, policies and practices. New Delhi, Pearson Education.